|Home|||||About CH101|||||1st and 2nd Century|||||3rd and 4th Century|||||Feedback: Questions/Answers|||||Contact CH101|
What is the Proper Name for the Land Occupied by Israel, Jordan, and Other Nations in the Middle East? Did ancient writers call the land "Palestine?"November 16th, 2009
The content on this page has been attacked by several visitors through comments and e-mail exchanges. I want to quickly say that I UNDERSTAND the political issues at stake - pro-Palestinian supporters are insisting that the land occupied by Israel should be called "Palestine" and they are using evidence from the ancient writers listed on this page to bolster their claims.
I am NOT trying to give evidence for or against ANY modern-day political position - I am an historian of the Greco-Roman period. I am NOT responsible for those who would use my comments for modern-day political reasons.
Palestine in the Ancient World
It is clear, then, that the Bible never uses the term Palestine to refer to the Holy Land as a whole, and that Bible maps that refer to Palestine in the Old or New Testament are, at best, inaccurate, and, at worst, are a conscious denial of the biblical name of Israel.
This comes from the Zola Levitt Web site
and is written by a Thomas S. McCall, Th.D. Dr. McCall goes on to say, "It appears that Bible-believing Christians have either knowingly or unwittingly
followed the world, pagans and haters of Israel in calling Israel by the anti-Israel term Palestine."
It was not until the Romans crushed the second Jewish revolt against Rome in 135 A.D. under Bar Kochba that Emperor Hadrian applied the term Palestine to the Land of Israel.
This is true. I have not yet found the ancient document where this is referenced, but I do want to challenge the overall tone that "Palestine" was somehow never used until Hadrian and that using the term is equal to being a "hater" of Israel (I will be sending this response to Zola Levitt and to Dr. McCall).
[Now, McCall specifically says Hadrian was the first to refer to "Israel" as "Palestine." I want to say that I am NOT suggesting that "Palestine" should EVER be used to refer to the land "Israel." This would be historically incorrect in the ancient world AND in the modern age. I AM saying that the term "Palestine" WAS used by ancient writers to refer to the region that included Judea.]------------------
I keep receiving comments from this page restating what Dr. McCall's position is, which I have clearly and accurately reported. See one such exchange at the bottom of this page.
Please do not send comments repeating what so many others have sent me. IF you can answer some of my objections I am happy to see/read historical evidence. If you can send me scholarship showing how the ancient writers' use of "Palestine" were tampered with, I will correct my mistake.
Palestine Used by Ancient Writers
Again if, as is fabled, there is a lake in Palestine, such that if you bind a man or beast and throw it in it floats and does not sink, this would bear out what we have said. They say that this lake is so bitter and salt that no fish live in it and that if you soak clothes in it and shake them it cleans them. Meteorology II.3
This is a clear example of using the term in a broad sense that includes Israel. Herodotus, speaking of circumcision, gives us an interesting text in Euterpe that includes Syria in Palestine,
The Phoenicians and the Syrians of Palestine themselves confess that they learnt the custom of the Egyptians; and the Syrians...say that they have recently adopted it from the Colchians. Now these are the only nations who use circumcision, and it is plain that they all imitate herein the Egyptians. Euterpe II.104
Philo is an interesting source since he was a contemporary of Jesus and a Jew. Speaking of the Essenes,
Moreover Palestine and Syria too are not barren of exemplary wisdom and virtue, which countries no slight portion of that most populous nation of the Jews inhabits. There is a portion of those people called Essenes, in number something more than four thousand in my opinion, who derive their name from their piety...because they are above all men devoted to the service of God, not sacrificing living animals, but studying rather to preserve their own minds in a state of holiness and purity. Every Good Man Is Free XII.75
Philo is also interesting because he represents the Hellenized Jews - Greek Jews scattered around the Roman Empire, unable to worship according to the Laws of Moses. Philo lived in Alexandria, Egypt with around 1 million Jews, the largest Jewish population outside of Jerusalem. Notice that he refers to "Palestine" as a region that includes the Jews.
Palestine in Bible Maps
Why not go back to the terms used in the New Testament? The Gospel writers used the term Israel to refer to the Land. Why should we use any other term when referring to the Land, especially now that the Jews are back in the Land and have re-established the nation of Israel among the family of nations?
As I have already alluded to, the problem with this position is that "Palestine" includes many territories other than Israel. I am looking at Map 10 in my copy of The New Oxford Annotated Bible with The Apocrypha - this map includes Syria, Galilee, and Samaria. Map 11 is the same. Are we supposed to only have Israel on these maps, or are we to name the map "Israel during the time of Herod" and include these other territories, thus doing to Syria what McCall claims is being done to Israel? This, of course, is absurd.
Here is a compilation of 2-3 threads that began with "Comments" and continued in an e-mail exchange on this topic.
Visitor:Response by Al B.
The ancient writers you list (like Aristotle) are Greek writers, so their use of "Palestine" is dubious - it is fairly certain that the translators of these writers inserted the term "Palestine." "Palestine" was always the term used in relation to the Philistines, the people that lived on the coast and was an enemy of Israel. "Palestine" never existed as an independent entity. "Palestine" was part of the Egyptian kingdom under the Ptolemaic rule. Later "Palestine" was part of Syria and Phoenicia during the Seleucid kingdom. Yet throughout this history Judea was a separate and independent nation. The Greeks, under Alexander the Great, allowed Judah to remain independent until the time of Antiochus IV.
It is interesting how many people like you e-mail these exact comments [In other words, "try thinking for yourself rather than copying from another web site"].
IF Judea is the proper term for the entire region, then why does Luke/Acts reference: "...you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria..." Acts 1:8
AND in Chapter 2:7-9
Utterly amazed, they asked: ďArenít all these who are speaking Galileans? 8 Then how is it that each of us hears them in our native language? 9 Parthians, Medes and Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia...
So here we have Luke speaking of Galileans, then mentioning Judea in a listing of nations/countries. Why would he do this? "Each of us hears them in our native language?" Why would he not say Judeans? Because Galilee was seen as a separate province from Judea?
Galilee was separated from Judea by Samaria, another province.
My question to you is this: was Samaria part of Judea in the first century geography?
If yes, then why does Luke refer to them separately?
If no, then it is obvious that Judea does not refer to the entire region which is why the term Palestine seems to have been used.
More than one person has stated to me that "Palestine" was inserted by translators - I would like someone to point me to an historian who will illustrate this data for me. I have not read this in ANY credible historian. Here are a few of the scholars I have in front of me and the first usage of "Palestine" in each work:
Hans Lietzmann, The Beginnings of the Christian Church uses "Palestine" on p.18
Henry Chadwick, The Early Church: uses "Palestine" on p.10
WHC Frend, The Rise of Christianity: "Palestinian Judaism" on p.12
James Robinson, The Gospel of Jesus: discussing the reading of Torah in the "Palestinian synagogue," Robinson states that "outside of Palestine, the translation would have been into Greek," on p.70
Nov 18, 2015 - I just found yet another very good historian, who uses the term in his title: The Land Called Holy: Palestine in Christian History and Thought, (1992) Robert Louis Wilken.
* * * After several exchanges I also found this scholar * * *
Yuval Shahar, "Josephus Geographicus: The Classical Context of Geography in Josephus." Shahar illustrates how Strabo and Josephus describe Palestine in three regions: the Lake of Gennesar, the valley of Jericho, and the Dead Sea. For those who would accuse me (or anyone else of "Israel hating," I would urge you to check out this Jewish scholar, Yuval Shahar, educated in Israel, yet he uses "Palestine" and reports that Strabo and Josephus used this term as well. Shahar never mentions the supposed insertion of the term "Palestine" by Greek translators - I am more convinced that this is an "old wives tale."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I do not disagree with the name change that you are telling me happened later under Hadrian. But IF ancients writers prior to this time use the term "Palestine," which I THINK they do...then it is an historical term.
Visitor Reply:Response by Al B.
Are you trying to suggest Judah was not the southern part of the divided Kingdom? If so, you're inventing history. [I typically do not "suggest" things. I typically say what I think in a clear fashion - Al.B.]
Irrespective of whether Herodotus and Aristotle used "Palestine" or not, they were Europeans from another continent who were referring to Philistia, the limited southwestern coastal region of the land also referred to in the Hebrew Bible. [The citation I have used from Aristotle is talking about the Dead Sea. Thus, Aristotle is obviously NOT referring to Philistia - he IS clearly referring to Judea. This visitor consistently fails to address my fundamental question: IF Aristotle's Greek was changed by later translators, please point me to an academic source that will instruct me on this point. Al.B.] Incidentally, the Septuagint refers to Philistieim or Phylistines, not Palestine. And, as I stated earlier, "Palestine" was not recognized as a separate entity by the Seleucids and Ptolemies, who viewed the land as an integral part of the Egyptian Kingdom and of Syria.
The correct historical geographic name of the land was Canaan/Judah/Israel, not Palestine a term non-existent in Hebrew, Arabic nor in any Semitic language. Nor, does Palestine exist in any ancient archaeological findings.
The consensus among historians is the official change from Judah/Judea to Syria Palaestina was instituted by the Romans in retribution for the Bar Kokhba uprising, in an attempt to erase the histlorical Jewish connection with the land, renamed after the Philistines, the ancient enemies of the Israelites.
"Palestine" is derived from the Hebrew Peleshet [Land of the Invaders/Philistines] which the Greeks changed to Palaistine and the Romans to Palaestina.
I fully understand that this term was NOT used in Hebrew, nor in the LXX, nor in the NT. But the point that started my posting was someone attacking my usage of the term, stating (as you do) that the Romans changed the name after Bar Kochba. Fine. I do not disagree with this data, but I was pointed to an article that stated "Palestine" had NEVER been used until Hadrian and attacking me and every other historian [that uses the term "Palestine"] as "anti-Israel." My point is to show that the term WAS used prior to Hadrian as a way of referring to the REGION, of which Judea/Israel was included. Yes, these were "Europeans," but it is still historical data. You state, "The consensus among historians..."
Please, point me to some credible historians where they verify the point you are making. As I stated, I am happy to admit where I am wrong and correct the record. [I will admit here that my statement is not as clear as it could have been. This person continues to present the data about Hadrian - I am asking for someone to verify that the Greek of Aristotle and Philo in particular were tampered/changed to reflect "Palestine."]
I have now consulted with three modern experts of Philo and Josephus (one exchanged a few e-mails with me), all Jewish scholars. In my reading two of these scholars never mentioned this theory of editing "Palestine" into the Greek documents. The one scholar I exchanged e-mails with reports to me that she has never heard of this theory. I seriously doubt this theory and welcome anyone who can point me to credible scholarly work that would indicate otherwise.
Visitor Reply:Response by Al B.
See statements, below. The use of the word "Palestine" is limited to a small handful of Greek writers or, more likely, their later translators. Herodotus was translated 1300 years later. However, as stated previously, those references to "Palaistine" were derived from the Philistines and the Hebrew Peleshet. Herodotus has been accused of never having visited the Near East and of having not been truthful in other matters.
There is no evidence of which I'm aware of the Seleucids or Ptolemies using "Palestine" when it was under their sovereignty. The land was not separate from Syria.
"In an effort to wipe out all memory of the bond between the Jews and the land, Hadrian changed the name of the province from Iudaea to Syria-Palestina, a name that became common in non-Jewish literature." ~ A History of the Jewish People, Harvard University Press, 1976, page 334
[But again, this is restating the data regarding Hadrian. The visitor gives 3 more academic citations. - Al.B.]
Why is it that you and others who have written to me on this subject basically say the same thing over and over again?....It [does] not matter what questions/objections one offered, the response was the same...
I have now said twice that my disagreement is NOT with the name change after Hadrian. I am willing to concede this point. What I asked for was historical evidence (by the way, these quotes you offered below are NOT citing primary source documents which is what a credible historian should do) that no ancient writer used the term prior to Hadrian. You keep attacking Herodotus. Fine. How about Aristotle and Philo? You say later translators changed the language. Point me to some evidence of this.
Please stop telling me the same thing over and over as if to repeat something ad nauseam will make it true.
Show me something else.
Visitor Reply:Response by Al B.
I'm citing statements from eminent historians. No offense, but, you are not one. You seem rather obsessed with "Palestine" when historically the term is an obscure one.
I am a formally trained historian and I know what credible historical research/writing is. For this particular data a citation from primary source material is called for.
My request remains open to ALL on this subject:
See larger map of the region
All rights reserved.
|1st Century | 2nd Century | 3rd Century | 4th Century | Resources | Podcasts | Survey | Site Map|
The conversion of the apostle Paul
Early Church History of Galatians
James Just brother of Jesus in the Bible
1st Century Christian Church Struggles
Christian History - conversion Apostle Paul
Palestine - Philo, Josephus, Strabo, Aristotle
Apollos NT Hebrews in Ancient Rome
Apollos NT Hebrews in the Bible
Wine in Bible Alcoholic?
James the Just and Jesus in the Bible
Hellenized Jews New Testament
Jews and the conversion of the apostle Paul
Conflict in the Early Christian Church
Palestine vs Israel Zola Levitt Dr. McCall
Palestine in the Bible and the Ancient World
Apollos NT Hebrews in the Bible
Apollos NT Hebrews - Ancient Roman World
Palestine Israel in Ancient Greece Rome
Alcoholic Wine - New Testament
James the Just Paul and Jesus in the NT
How the NT Canon was formed or canonized
Questions about Wine in the Ancient World
Wine Alcohol in the Bible - New Testament
Early Church Catechesis - Catechetical Training
Questions regarding Christian Issues
Palestine - Israel Map Ancient World
Apollos Alexandria Hebrews in the Bible
Apollos Paul Corinthians - Bible
James the Just the brother of Jesus
Gnosticism in the 1st Century Early Church
Early Church History of Galations
Early Christianity War and Conflict
Early Christianity Constantine and War
Important Issues in Early Christianity
Palestine Israel in Greek Roman World
Apollos Alexandria Hebrews - Bible
Apollos Paul Corinthians NT